1987
DOI: 10.2307/2000734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Elliptic Equations Δu = K(x)u σ and Δu = K(x)e 2u

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We omit the details. D We now make an important remark; namely that Lemmas 4.2,4,4,and 4.5 have analogous statements when Kx is replaced by K2. The statements (i) still hold as stated, but e.g.…”
Section: Jomentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We omit the details. D We now make an important remark; namely that Lemmas 4.2,4,4,and 4.5 have analogous statements when Kx is replaced by K2. The statements (i) still hold as stated, but e.g.…”
Section: Jomentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Note that / may be empty; for example, if K(r) < 0 for all r > 0, and K(r) < -C/r2 for large r, where C > 0, then 1 = 0 (cf. Sattinger [9], Ni [8], or Cheng and Lin [4]). …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the existence, uniqueness and blow-up rate of solutions for problem (1) have been intensively studied in the past few years (see [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]11,[13][14][15][16][17], etc.) For the sublinear case f (u) = u m , m ∈ (0, 1), little is known relatively.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He showed that in case K ≡ −1, equation (1.1) does not have any solution in R 2 . His result was later improved by Sattinger [12], Ni [10] and Cheng and Lin [2]. These results basically contains the following: If K(x) ≤ 0 and K(x) ≤ −|x| −2 near ∞, then equation (1.1) possesses no solutions in R 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%