2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2163509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Empirical Importance of Periodicity In the Volatility of Financial Time Series

Abstract: N a t i o n a l B a n k o f P o l a n d

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common approach to non-stationary volatility is to decompose σ 2 t multiplicatively, see (amongst other) Van Bellegem and Von Sachs (2004), Engle and Rangel (2008), Mazur and Pipien (2012), and Terasvirta (2014a, 2014b). This means…”
Section: Non-stationary Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach to non-stationary volatility is to decompose σ 2 t multiplicatively, see (amongst other) Van Bellegem and Von Sachs (2004), Engle and Rangel (2008), Mazur and Pipien (2012), and Terasvirta (2014a, 2014b). This means…”
Section: Non-stationary Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the model is capable of accommodating systematic changes in the amplitude of the volatility clusters that cannot be explained by a constantparameter GARCH model. Recently, Mazur and Pipien (2012) show that financial market data often exhibit volatility clustering and cyclical behavior, where time series show periods of high volatility and periods of low volatility.…”
Section: Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonstationary component is typically a deterministic function of time, whereas the stationary component follows a GARCH process; see van Bellegem and von Sachs (2004), Feng (2004), Engle and Rangel (2008) and Teräsvirta (2008, 2013). For a similar approach see also Brownlees and Gallo (2010), Mazur and Pipień (2012), and Osiewalski and Pajor (2009). Mishra, Su and Ullah (2010) suggested yet another, completely stochastic, decomposition in which the second component is a slow-moving one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%