2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10663-015-9289-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the empirical relevance of the Lucas critique: the case of euro area money demand

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of Italy, Daniele et al (2017) by studying a long time historical period argue that variables like exchange rate and its volatility can contribute to the stability of money demand function arguing for narrower monetary aggregates. Another interesting point is the studies of Dreger and Wolters (2015, 2016) who show that the recent monetary policy shifts toward unconventional measures by ECB and Fed do not lead to a breakdown of money demand, that can provide reliable information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of Italy, Daniele et al (2017) by studying a long time historical period argue that variables like exchange rate and its volatility can contribute to the stability of money demand function arguing for narrower monetary aggregates. Another interesting point is the studies of Dreger and Wolters (2015, 2016) who show that the recent monetary policy shifts toward unconventional measures by ECB and Fed do not lead to a breakdown of money demand, that can provide reliable information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%