2016
DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics20163815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Enduring Importance of Deep Ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, interest in deep ecology has diminished among many environmental philosophers, and David Keller (2008, 210) has argued that there is "a significant consensus that deep ecology has reached its logical conclusion and has exhausted itself." Others disagree (Lynch and Norris 2016) Environmental virtue ethics offers a third approach to considering the relationships between self, community, and world. In the influential paper, "Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments," Thomas Hill Jr. (1983) called attention to environmental ethics as involving questions of human character.…”
Section: Living Well In the World: Self And Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, interest in deep ecology has diminished among many environmental philosophers, and David Keller (2008, 210) has argued that there is "a significant consensus that deep ecology has reached its logical conclusion and has exhausted itself." Others disagree (Lynch and Norris 2016) Environmental virtue ethics offers a third approach to considering the relationships between self, community, and world. In the influential paper, "Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments," Thomas Hill Jr. (1983) called attention to environmental ethics as involving questions of human character.…”
Section: Living Well In the World: Self And Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defenders of deep ecology have attempted to answer these critiques, and deep ecology is arguably best understood as a general approach rather than a specific theory (as Naess [1986] himself suggested in distinguishing his own Ecosophy T from deep ecological approaches that rest on different foundations), so some versions are more susceptible to certain criticisms than others. Nevertheless, interest in deep ecology has diminished among many environmental philosophers, and David Keller (2008, 210) has argued that there is “a significant consensus that deep ecology has reached its logical conclusion and has exhausted itself.” Others disagree (Lynch and Norris 2016), and recent work in comparative philosophy has engaged deep ecology in relation to Confucianism, Buddhism, and other traditions (see, e.g., Nuyen 2011; Cheng 2016; Anderson 2020). Additionally, the concept of an ecological self remains salient, particularly in contemporary research linking philosophical theory with empirical psychology.…”
Section: Living Well In the World: Self And Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To advance this debate and develop an understanding of these emerging phenomena, authors have called for a deeper engagement with alternative theoretical approaches (Jennings & Hoffman, 2019) and a departure from anthropocentric values and thinking (Heikkurinen et al, 2016). Ecocentrism (Lynch & Norris, 2016;Purser et al, 1995) offers a way forward as it defies the linear, siloed, and dualistic understanding of human-nature relationships, which still prevails in environmental management and business sustainability more broadly (Heikkurinen, Ruuska, et al, 2019). By situating nature at the center, ecocentrism invites a rethinking of the current understanding of human needs and freedoms facing ecological systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%