2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccw.2011.5963557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] claims that CCN is even more energy-efficient than a traditional CDN. [15] refines this claim by revealing the dependency on content popularity and catalog size. In this paper, we consider only the CDN architecture and don't take the location of the cache servers into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[14] claims that CCN is even more energy-efficient than a traditional CDN. [15] refines this claim by revealing the dependency on content popularity and catalog size. In this paper, we consider only the CDN architecture and don't take the location of the cache servers into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We assume that the number of different contents provided by a content provider is F, ranked from 1 (the most popular) to F (the least popular) based on its popularity [13,14]. By letting the total number of requests in a given time duration t be R, the number of requests to the content of popularity k, K r , follows a Zipf-like distribution as…”
Section: Content Popularity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [11] [12] show how a CCN approach can be energy-efficient, especially when popular contents are delivered. Though we do not focus on CCN, these works are relevant as we gather the assumption that every network equipment can be equipped with storage capabilities.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%