2015
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the enhancement of low-order mixed finite element methods for the large deformation analysis of diffusion in solids

Abstract: Summary A stabilized scheme is developed for mixed finite element methods for strongly coupled diffusion problems in solids capable of large deformations. Enhanced assumed strain techniques are employed to cure spurious oscillation patterns of low‐order displacement/pressure mixed formulations in the incompressible limit for quadrilateral elements and brick elements. A study is presented that shows how hourglass instabilities resulting from geometrically nonlinear enhanced assumed strain methods have to be dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark The center evaluation is, eg, used in . A possible alternative is the use of the average deformation gradient boldFavg=1VnormalΩeboldFh,enormaldV within an element with volume V as eg done in, the works . However, differences between using the average value and the evaluation at the element centroid are very small in usual problems without localization of strains (see Section 3.7).…”
Section: Enhanced Assumed Strain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark The center evaluation is, eg, used in . A possible alternative is the use of the average deformation gradient boldFavg=1VnormalΩeboldFh,enormaldV within an element with volume V as eg done in, the works . However, differences between using the average value and the evaluation at the element centroid are very small in usual problems without localization of strains (see Section 3.7).…”
Section: Enhanced Assumed Strain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, they improve the bending behavior in initially distorted meshes. One well‐working and widely used possibility (cf, eg, works) is boldMIfalse(boldXfalse)=j0jh,efalse(𝛏false)boldJ0normalTtrueboldM^Ifalse(𝛏false)boldJ01, where j h , e , j 0 and J 0 are given in and , respectively. The special structure with the elementwise constant quantities j 0 and J 0 ensures that the patch test is fulfilled by construction of the enhanced field (see Section 2.4).…”
Section: Enhanced Assumed Strain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key step to simplify the analysis is to take advantage of the fact that the spaces bold-italicVbold-italicuh, bold-italicVph, and V λ are all finite dimensional and spanned by the basis function (cf. ). This fact allows us to construct a bijective map from the finite dimensional spaces bold-italicVbold-italicuh, bold-italicVph, and V λ onto the Euclidean space of the nodal solution.…”
Section: Numerical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In poromechanics, it is well known that the inf–sup condition arises when the pore fluid imposes an incompressibility constraint in the solid deformation—which is common especially in the early stages of loading. As such, mixed finite elements that employ equal‐order interpolations for the displacement and pore pressure fields may result in spurious oscillations in the pore pressure field, see for example.…”
Section: Numerical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for ν = 0.49 even 12 quadratic elements (142 DOFs) are more accurate than 48000 linear elements (107998 DOFs). It is well-known that in the incompressibility limit ν → 0.5 classical quadratic elements show locking behavior and mixed, enhanced, or stabilized formulations [23,33,44,[50][51][52]60,62] shall be used.…”
Section: Numerical Investigation By Eigenvalue Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%