2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(00)00150-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the enumeration and generation of generalized Dyck words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now understood that the kernel method provides a systematic solution to all such problems, which are, in essence, one-dimensional [14,2]. Other generic approaches to half-space problems are provided in [20,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now understood that the kernel method provides a systematic solution to all such problems, which are, in essence, one-dimensional [14,2]. Other generic approaches to half-space problems are provided in [20,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the whole machinery we developed for M/M r /1 works after a proper reparameterization again. Hence all that has to be done is to exchange m ↔ k and λ ↔ µ in formula (11). We omit the details here, for more information see and Böhm (1993) where these models are dealt with in discrete time and the corresponding continuous time formulas are derived by a limiting procedure.…”
Section: Champernowne's Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case at hand, the slope is 2m+1 2 . In [9], Duchon provided an algebraic grammar for generalized Dyck languages (as introduced by Labelle and Yeh [10]) and proved that words in such a language can be obtained uniquely by inserting words of the language into factor-free words of the same language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in [9,Section 5], the algebraic grammars for D A,h and D A,h can be described by a system of derivation rules in terms of certain auxiliary languages with restrictions on their total and partial valuations. As we will see in Section 2, for Dyck words with slope 2m+1 2 , the aforementioned derivation rules may be reduced to a single core language that we denote by U , or U 2m+1 2 if we wish to emphasize the slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%