1994
DOI: 10.2307/2290872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Equivalence of Constrained and Compound Optimal Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
114
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, constrained optimal designs are harder to ÿnd but easier to interpret because of the intuitive formulation of the design problem. Cook and Wong [12] considered linear models when there are two objectives and established that every constrained optimal design is a compound optimal design and vice versa. Clyde and Chaloner [13] extended this equivalence result to non-linear models where there are two or more objectives and Bayesian optimal designs are sought.…”
Section: An Equivalence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, constrained optimal designs are harder to ÿnd but easier to interpret because of the intuitive formulation of the design problem. Cook and Wong [12] considered linear models when there are two objectives and established that every constrained optimal design is a compound optimal design and vice versa. Clyde and Chaloner [13] extended this equivalence result to non-linear models where there are two or more objectives and Bayesian optimal designs are sought.…”
Section: An Equivalence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that we want a constrained optimal design with e 2 ¿0:90 and e 1 = e 3 : In the Appendix we argued that when 1 = 3 = , the compound optimal design is approximately symmetric about 0 and has the same e ciency for estimating ED25 and ED75, that is, e 1 ≈ e 3 . This implies that the original three-objective design problem can be reduced to a two-objective problem, and the desired constrained optimal design can be found from an e ciency plot [12]. In this case, since e 1 ≈ e 3 , we plot e 1 (or e 3 ) and e 2 versus (Figure 1) where ranges from 0 to 0.5.…”
Section: Equal Interest In Ed25 and Ed75mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, more research has been done to conduct multiple objective designs (Cook & Wong, 1994;Clyde & Chaloner, 1996;Antognini & Giovagnoli, 2010). More recently, we proposed an adaptive allocation strategy to construct multiple-objective RADs, that increase both estimation precision and treatment benefit for trials with continuous outcomes (Liang & Carriere, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present paper is devoted to the problem of constructing optimal discrimination designs using constrained optimality criteria. Constrained optimal designs have primarily been considered by Stigler (1971), Studden (1982b) and Lee (1988a,b), whereas Cook and Wong (1994), Dette (1995) and Clyde and Chaloner (1996) investigated the relation between this approach and compound optimality criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%