1997
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The panel unit root tests have further been extended to various panel tests for cointegration by, e.g. Pedroni (1996), Kao (1999), Kao and Chiang (2000) and McCoskey and Kao (1997). These panel cointegration tests are in essence univariate extensions of the original panel unit root tests based on the residuals from a first-step cointegrating regression in the spirit of the two-step cointegration test approach by Engle and Granger (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The panel unit root tests have further been extended to various panel tests for cointegration by, e.g. Pedroni (1996), Kao (1999), Kao and Chiang (2000) and McCoskey and Kao (1997). These panel cointegration tests are in essence univariate extensions of the original panel unit root tests based on the residuals from a first-step cointegrating regression in the spirit of the two-step cointegration test approach by Engle and Granger (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [47] note that a linear combination of two or more I(1) series may be cointegrated, and such linear combination yields a long-run relationship between the variables. References [42]- [44] [50] suggested the use Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) to provide optimal estimates of cointegrating regressions. The method modifies least squares to account for serial correlation effects and for the endogeneity in the regressors that result from the existence of a cointegrating relationship.…”
Section: Inferential Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the panel cointegration process (e.g., Phillips and Moon (1999), Kao and Chiang (2000)):…”
Section: Asymptotic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to Durbin and Watson (1951) and Box and Pierce (1970), whose test statistics or limit distributions have to be modified when applied to estimated residuals of a stationary dynamic model. If regressors contain deterministic or stochastic trending variables, the limit distributions of these tests will become nonstandard (e.g., Kao and Chiang (2000), Kao and Emerson (2004)). Intuitively, parameter estimation uncertainty for β induces an adjustment of a finite number of degrees of freedom forŴ 1 andŴ 2 , but this becomes negligible as n → ∞…”
Section: Asymptotic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%