2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the estimation of the diffusion coefficient and distribution of hydrogen in stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast here, the thickness of austenite layers is of the order of 10 nm only. Considering a diffusion coefficient of about 10 -15 m²/s [103] in austenite, the time needed for hydrogen to travel 10 nm is as short as 0.1 s, which is orders of magnitude shorter than the permeation times measured in this study (or than the charging times used before TDS). Thus it seems reasonable in our case to assume that austenite is equilibrated with the surrounding martensite at any time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In contrast here, the thickness of austenite layers is of the order of 10 nm only. Considering a diffusion coefficient of about 10 -15 m²/s [103] in austenite, the time needed for hydrogen to travel 10 nm is as short as 0.1 s, which is orders of magnitude shorter than the permeation times measured in this study (or than the charging times used before TDS). Thus it seems reasonable in our case to assume that austenite is equilibrated with the surrounding martensite at any time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, full quantification of H is still challenging because the calibration of potential is difficult and the surface condition of the sample plays a crucial role. In many cases, SKPFM is combined with other characterization techniques, for instance, TDS, glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy, and SIMS, to robustly reveal H distribution and trapping related to microstructural defects. Nevertheless, SKPFM has been primarily applied on fcc metals after H pre-charging because of the slow H diffusivity.…”
Section: Knowledge Base About Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the potential drops more steeply at the interface compared to that inside the matrix and the precipitate, indicating that the interface traps more H than the matrix. So far, SKPFM has been successfully used to determine H distribution in stainless steel, nickel, aluminum alloy, and palladium . However, full quantification of H is still challenging because the calibration of potential is difficult and the surface condition of the sample plays a crucial role.…”
Section: Knowledge Base About Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, cathodic hydrogen charging yields metallic materials with a low hydrogen diffusion coefficient and low hydrogen content in an ambient environment. Duportal et al (2020) performed cathodic hydrogen charging on AISI 316L stainless steel (Ni wt%: 12.4%) in an electrolyte solution of sodium hydroxide and ammonium thiocyanate with a high current density of 100 mA/cm 2 at 50 • C [35]. A charging time of 72 h resulted in a hydrogen content of 80 ± 17 wppm.…”
Section: Hydrogen Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%