2018
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201800240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Evaluation of the Average Crystalline Size and Surface Area of Platinum Catalyst Nanoparticles

Abstract: In the present work, the effect of grain size distribution on the diffraction profile shape is inspected via analysis of the mutual ratio of Lorentz and Gauss components in pseudo-Voigt function which is used for simulating X-ray profiles of nanoparticles. As established from the plotted dependences, the error in the average Pt nanoparticles size determination reaches 56% and the discrepancy between calculated Pt nanoparticle surface areas attains 60%. Furthermore, the determination error becomes greater with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The information obtained by the Rietveld refinement was the crystallite size and microstrains as both are related (to extend) to the catalytic properties of the materials. 38,39 This is also proven by the BET measurements as it can be seen later in the text (Part 3.1.3). On the other side, the microstrains are related to the density of the defects in the crystal structure.…”
Section: 1 Characterization Of the Phase Composition By X-ray Difsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The information obtained by the Rietveld refinement was the crystallite size and microstrains as both are related (to extend) to the catalytic properties of the materials. 38,39 This is also proven by the BET measurements as it can be seen later in the text (Part 3.1.3). On the other side, the microstrains are related to the density of the defects in the crystal structure.…”
Section: 1 Characterization Of the Phase Composition By X-ray Difsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…(iv) The geometric surface area of the catalyst nanoparticles, calculated according to the technique reported in a previous work [22], as well as the average size and particle size distribution are given in Table 2. The particle size distributions are also shown in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Physical Characterization Of Pt/c Electrocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the average size of crystallites determined using XRD is usually smaller than the size of nanoparticles determined using TEM [40,41]. The main reasons for this difference are as follows: one nanoparticle can consist of several crystallites; the presence of an amorphous layer on the nanoparticle surface that is not detected using XRD; and there are different approaches to calculating the average crystallite size [42]. The line scanning of the elemental composition of PtCu/C material (Figure 2d,e) confirms the uniform distribution of components in PtCu nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%