2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2013.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the excessive[m]-index of a tree

Abstract: The excessive [m]-index of a graph G, denoted by χ ′[m] (G), is the minimum number of matchings of size m needed to cover the edge-set of G. We set χ ′[m] (G) = ∞ if such a cover does not exist and we call a graphThe case m = 3 is completely solved by Cariolaro and Fu in [4]. In this paper we prove a general formula to compute the excessive [4]-index of a tree and we conjecture a possible generalization for any value of m. Furthermore, we prove that such a formula does not work for the excessive [4]-index of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For B>3 a general formula for χ[B](G) is presently unknown. Only for trees, a most basic and simple class of graphs, such a formula has been recently obtained for B=4. However, it has been proved in that the problem of the computation of χ[B](G) can be solved in polynomial time for the class of bipartite multigraphs.…”
Section: Notation Terminology and Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For B>3 a general formula for χ[B](G) is presently unknown. Only for trees, a most basic and simple class of graphs, such a formula has been recently obtained for B=4. However, it has been proved in that the problem of the computation of χ[B](G) can be solved in polynomial time for the class of bipartite multigraphs.…”
Section: Notation Terminology and Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2,4,5,7,12,13,15]) and connections with some important combinatorial problems such as the Berge-Fulkerson Conjecture have already been noticed [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%