2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-8956(02)00046-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the excluded minors for the matroids of branch-width k

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary of H ′ 1 is of size k t, and so [34,Lemma 4.1] can be applied to F 1 . Therefore, we have |E(H 1 )| g(k) g(t) and |E(F )| g(t) + t 2 , and there are only nitely many such t-boundaried graphs without isolated vertices in X * t .…”
Section: Fii and Structural Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary of H ′ 1 is of size k t, and so [34,Lemma 4.1] can be applied to F 1 . Therefore, we have |E(H 1 )| g(k) g(t) and |E(F )| g(t) + t 2 , and there are only nitely many such t-boundaried graphs without isolated vertices in X * t .…”
Section: Fii and Structural Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counterpart of branchwidth on matroids has been introduced by Geelen and Whittle in [6] and was extensively studied in [6,15,10,14,11,5]. However, not much is known for the counterpart of pathwidth on matroids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more promising strategy towards detecting constructive fragments of Theorem 3, is to detect parameters -or families of parameters -where O ≤m p,k is recursive. For this one may either prove upper bounds for |O ≤m p,k |, as done in [57] for the case of branchwidth 5 , or provide partial characterizations of O ≤m p,k , as done in [2,19,21,89,94], that permit its recursive computation.…”
Section: Minor-closed Graph Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%