On the existence of J 2 invariant relative orbits from the dynamical system point of view

Abstract

The present paper addresses the existence of J 2 invariant relative orbits with arbitrary relative magnitude over the infinite time using the Routh reduction and Poincaré techniques in the J 2 Hamiltonian problem. The current research also proposes a novel numerical searching approach for J 2 invariant relative orbits from the dynamical system point of view. A new type of Poincaré mapping is defined from different central manifolds of the pseudocircular orbits (parameterized by the Jacobi energy E, the polar component of momentum H z and the measure of distance r between the fixed point and its central manifolds) to the nodal periods T d and the drifts of longitude of the ascending node during one period ( ), which differs from Koon et al.'s (AIAA 2001) definition on central manifolds parameterized by the same fixed point. The Poincaré mapping is surjective because it compresses the three-dimensional variables into two-dimensional images, and the mapping degenerates into a bijective mapping in consideration of the fixed points. An iteration algorithm to the degenerated bijective mapping is proposed from the continuation procedure to perform the ergodic representation of E-and H z -contour maps on the space of T d -. For the surjective mapping with r = 0, different pseudo-circular or elliptical orbits may share the same images. Hence, the inverse surjective mapping may achieve non-unique variables from a single image, which makes the generation of J 2 invariant relative orbits possible. The pseudo-circular or elliptical orbits generated from the surjective mapping will be defined in different meridian planes. Hence, the critical contribution of the present paper is the assignment of J 2 invariant relative orbits to different invariant parameters E and H z depending on the E-and H z -contour map, which will hold J 2 invariant relative orbits for extended durations. To investigate the high-order nonlinearity neglected by previous studies, a formation configuration with a 123 428 M. Xu et al.large magnitude of 500 km is successfully generated from the theory developed in the present work, which is beyond the scope of the linear conditions of J 2 invariant relative orbits. Therefore, the existence of J 2 invariant relative orbit with an arbitrary relative magnitude over the infinite time is achieved from the dynamical system point of view.

Long-term passive distance-bounded relative motion in the presence of $$J_2$$ J 2 perturbations

“…However, it is worth mentioning that when the J 2 perturbation is fully taken into account to derive the nodal period and the drift of RAAN per nodal period of the pseudo-elliptical orbit, P γ and D Ω is periodic rather than constant with respect to the orbital resolutions. In (Xu et al 2012), the periodic nodal periods and the drifts of RAAN per nodal period are averaged, respectively, to represent P γ and D Ω of pseudo-elliptical orbits. In this paper, for long-term orbital motion one 1/r in (21) is approximated by its time average with respect to the true anomaly f , and hence the nodal period and the drift of RAAN per nodal period of the pseudo-elliptical orbit are (Xu et al 2012), the representation in this paper is based on an analytical solution.…”

“…In (Xu et al 2012), the periodic nodal periods and the drifts of RAAN per nodal period are averaged, respectively, to represent P γ and D Ω of pseudo-elliptical orbits. In this paper, for long-term orbital motion one 1/r in (21) is approximated by its time average with respect to the true anomaly f , and hence the nodal period and the drift of RAAN per nodal period of the pseudo-elliptical orbit are (Xu et al 2012), the representation in this paper is based on an analytical solution. Therefore, the computational load of the algorithm is much less.…”

“…Another important numerical approach is based on the Poincaré surface of section from the dynamical system point of view (Xu et al 2012). The J 2 perturbation is fully included in the Hamiltonian and the resulting drifts are not matched instantaneously.…”

“…The literature review can be summarized as follows which is made mainly based on (Xu et al 2012) and (Broucke 1994). Satellites' orbits under the J 2 perturbation can be classified as pseudo-circular or pseudo-elliptical (without consideration of the chaotic phenomena).…”

A New Constellation Architecture for Practical Responsive Revisiting

“…For the single-burn strategy, the nominal orbital elements Áa and Ái are expected to be zeros. Compared with the infinite duration of the J 2 invariant relative orbit in formation flying, 17,21) the J 2 invariant PTR constellation can only evolve inside the boundaries in a limited duration. Substitute Eq.…”