2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4049(01)00175-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the existence of normal maximal subgroups in division rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, when Z(D ) = 1 we have D * = F * × D . Hence, by [1,Theorem 6], F * has a normal maximal subgroup. So, D * has also a normal maximal subgroup.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But, when Z(D ) = 1 we have D * = F * × D . Hence, by [1,Theorem 6], F * has a normal maximal subgroup. So, D * has also a normal maximal subgroup.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this paper we investigate some properties of maximal subgroups of the general skew linear group. The structure of such groups have been studied in various papers (e.g., see [1][2][3][4]). An interesting question which has not been answered yet is whether the multiplicative group of every noncommutative division ring has a maximal subgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Nrd D : D * → F * be the reduced norm map, D (1) the kernel of this map and D the commutator subgroup of D * . The inclusion map F → D induces a homomorphism K 1 (F ) = F * → K 1 (D) = D * /D .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since x −n Nrd(x) ∈ D (1) and the reduced Whitehead group SK 1 (D) = D (1) /D is n-torsion (by [4], p. 157, Lemma 2), it follows that CK 1 (D) is an abelian group of bounded exponent n 2 . (In fact one can show that the bound is n, see the proof of Lemma 4, p. 154 in [4] or pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation