2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00387-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the feasibility of urban wastewater tertiary treatment by membranes: a comparative assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Snyder et al (2007) confirmed that the vast majority of PPCPs spiked to a secondary effluent were not rejected when passing through an UF system, although estrogens (E2, E1 and EE2) were well removed (91-99%) which was attributed to their relatively high sorption properties, even though other compounds as for example HHCB did not follow this pattern. Although the technical feasibility of membranes has been demonstrated, their implementation is still limited because of the high investment and operational costs involved (Alonso et al 2001). If membrane filtration is required as a post-treatment technique for an efficient removal of micropollutants, nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) constitute an interesting alternative (Snyder et al 2007).…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snyder et al (2007) confirmed that the vast majority of PPCPs spiked to a secondary effluent were not rejected when passing through an UF system, although estrogens (E2, E1 and EE2) were well removed (91-99%) which was attributed to their relatively high sorption properties, even though other compounds as for example HHCB did not follow this pattern. Although the technical feasibility of membranes has been demonstrated, their implementation is still limited because of the high investment and operational costs involved (Alonso et al 2001). If membrane filtration is required as a post-treatment technique for an efficient removal of micropollutants, nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) constitute an interesting alternative (Snyder et al 2007).…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field data is preferable, however, literature data is also used when field data is lacking. For the complex data requirement option 1 of CMF, field data was obtained from the Rouse Hill water recycling plant with the use of literature data to supplement the data set where necessary (Schafer, 1999;Alonso et al, 2001;Bersillon and Thompson, 1996;STOWA, 2001). For the simpler data requirement options 2 of MBR and WSP, reliable literature data was used (Aquatec Maxcon Pty Ltd., 2003;Vigneswaran et al, 2001;Schafer, 1999;Bersillon and Thompson, 1996;Holler and Trosch, 2001;Manem and Sanderson, 1996;Reed et al, 1995;Metcalf and Eddy, 1991;Toumi et al, 2000;Nameche et al, 2000;Garcia et al, 2000).…”
Section: Operation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…COD and BOD removal efficiencies, therefore, were approximately 57.5% and 66.7%, respectively. These removal efficiencies may result from the type of organic fraction that is mostly in suspended form (Alonso et al 2001). …”
Section: Water Quality Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%