2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the feasibility of using phase change materials (PCMs) to mitigate thermal cracking in cementitious materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
113
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that higher levels of replacement lead to higher strength loss for all tested ages: this is expected when a hard filler (i.e. limestone powder) [33] is substituted by softer inclusions (microencapsulated PCM) [28,30]. The same trend was reported previously for mortars where microencapsulated PCM was used to partially replace fine aggregate (sand) [31].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that higher levels of replacement lead to higher strength loss for all tested ages: this is expected when a hard filler (i.e. limestone powder) [33] is substituted by softer inclusions (microencapsulated PCM) [28,30]. The same trend was reported previously for mortars where microencapsulated PCM was used to partially replace fine aggregate (sand) [31].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Previous studies using similar microencapsulated PCM materials [28,31] have suggested that the drop in flexural strength due to PCM addition is less pronounced compared to the drop in compressive strength. Development of flexural strength as a function of time is shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations