2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.11651
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the finiteness of twists of irreducible symplectic varieties

Abstract: Hyperkähler varieties are higher-dimensional analogues of K3 surfaces. In this paper, we prove the finiteness of twists of hyperkähler varieties via a fixed finite field extension of characteristic 0. The main ingredient of the proof is the cone conjecture of hyperkähler varieties, which was proved by Markman and Amerik-Verbitsky. To prove the main theorem, we discuss the cone conjecture over nonclosed fields by Bright-Logan-van Luijk's method. We also give an application to the finiteness of derived equivalen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of K3 surfaces, such a statement can be justified by the action of Weyl groups on Picard lattices, but for general irreducible symplectic varieties, we need additional arguments since there may exist birationally equivalent non-isomorphic irreducible symplectic varieties. Such a problem is related to the Cone conjecture for irreducible symplectic varieties, and actually already discussed in [Tak21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of K3 surfaces, such a statement can be justified by the action of Weyl groups on Picard lattices, but for general irreducible symplectic varieties, we need additional arguments since there may exist birationally equivalent non-isomorphic irreducible symplectic varieties. Such a problem is related to the Cone conjecture for irreducible symplectic varieties, and actually already discussed in [Tak21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to Proposition 2.12, the cohomological Shafarevich condition can not distinguish between birationally isomorphic elements in Shaf hom M (F, R). This suggests our approach towards the Shafarevich conjecture: on one hand, we need the finiteness of isomorphism classes within a birational isomorphism class (this is guaranteed by a result of Takamatsu [61], recalled below as Theorem 3.5); on the other hand, we study the finiteness of birational isomorphism classes in various Shafarevich sets, which is the main goal of the paper, accomplished in Section 7.3).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f runs through all k-birational isomorphisms between X and other hyper-Kähler varieties over k. It is known that the closure of BA(X) is the movable cone Mov(X) (cf. [20,61]). Definition 3.1.…”
Section: Wall Divisors On Hyper-k äHler Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f runs through all k-birational isomorphisms from X to other hyper-Kähler varieties over k. It is known that the closure of BA(X) is the movable cone Mov(X) (see [27,79]). Definition 2.11.…”
Section: Polarization In Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the unramifiedness condition can not distinguish between birationally isomorphic members in Shaf hom M (F, R). This suggests our approach towards the Shafarevich conjecture: on one hand, we have the finiteness of isomorphism classes within a birational isomorphism class (this is guaranteed by [79], recalled above as Theorem 2.15); on the other hand, we study the finiteness of birational isomorphism classes in various Shafarevich sets, which is the main goal of the paper, accomplished in Section 7).…”
Section: Various Shafarevich Sets Of Hyper-k äHler Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%