Optical System Alignment, Tolerancing, and Verification XIV 2022
DOI: 10.1117/12.2644996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-the-fly optimization of synchrotron beamlines using machine learning

Abstract: Autonomous methods to align beamlines can decrease the amount of time spent on diagnostics, and also uncover better global optima leading to better beam quality. The alignment of these beamlines is a high-dimensional, expensive-to-sample optimization problem involving the simultaneous treatment of many optical elements with correlated and nonlinear dynamics. Bayesian optimization is a strategy of efficient global optimization that has proved successful in similar regimes in a wide variety of beamline alignment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the Blop agent to both command and control the beamline, leading to an easier implementation. 12 Bluesky has been mainly developed by NSLS-II, with a growing international collaboration at multiple facilities where it is used and expanded. The adoption of a single standard for experimental control and analysis across many facilities allows us to apply the same automated alignment tools with relatively little effort.…”
Section: B Blueskymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This allows the Blop agent to both command and control the beamline, leading to an easier implementation. 12 Bluesky has been mainly developed by NSLS-II, with a growing international collaboration at multiple facilities where it is used and expanded. The adoption of a single standard for experimental control and analysis across many facilities allows us to apply the same automated alignment tools with relatively little effort.…”
Section: B Blueskymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also represent the first step toward a fully autonomous beamline [5]. Some attempts at beamline alignment apply methods like genetic and differential evolution [6][7][8][9], attempt to match beamline data to an online model [10,11], or use families of commonly-used optimization algorithms [12]. These approaches are limited in that they give no guarantee of convergence to a global optimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering all factors above, given the intricacy of fourth-generation beamlines and their stringent performance criteria, manual techniques are often ineffective and frequently unfeasible. Instead, AI-powered auto-alignment for synchrotron beamlines has grown interest within the scientific community, explored through ML approaches [12,13] and optimization Algorithms [14]. The primary goal of these AI systems is to drastically reduce alignment time and to achieve and maintain a coherent focal spot size that adapts to the evolving sample conditions.…”
Section: *Lrebuffi@anlgovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complex and demanding nature of the fourth-generation synchrotron beamlines, manual approaches are considered inefficient and, in many cases, nearly impossible. Instead, emerging AI-driven auto-alignment control methods using ML [15,16] and optimization algorithms [17] are being developed. They aim to reduce alignment time, allow dynamic adjustments to the coherent focal spot size, and conserve valuable experimental time, marking a promising direction for the next generation of synchrotron radiation facility operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%