2003
DOI: 10.1017/s147054270300028x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Form and Interpretation of German Wh-Infinitives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we have to figure out how the specific purposive interpretation of the VP‐adjunct is established. As pointed out by Reis () and Rapp & Wöllstein () VPs that are not part of an extended functional projection CP are constrained to a modal interpretation . Their predicates rule out factual readings.…”
Section: Towards An Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next we have to figure out how the specific purposive interpretation of the VP‐adjunct is established. As pointed out by Reis () and Rapp & Wöllstein () VPs that are not part of an extended functional projection CP are constrained to a modal interpretation . Their predicates rule out factual readings.…”
Section: Towards An Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on structural conditions (root vs. embedded occurrences), lexical choice. Modal force may vary from (weak) readings (bare root infinitives) to strong readings in the case of warum ‐infinitives (Reis , Fortmann forthcoming).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, German, also a V2 language, has a certain type of wh-question where the verb appears in the infinitive, as shown in (17). Reis (2003) suggests that in these cases, the wh-phrase moves to the Spec of Force and matches the wh-feature in Force. If this is correct, then this movement is an alternative to moving the finite verb to the Force head.…”
Section: The Position Of the Finite Verb In Mainland Scandinavian V2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapp & Wöllstein (2009), Reis (2003 Curme (1922), Disterheft (1981) und Paul (1920 geben -wenn auch oft eher in Andeutungen ausgeführte -Hinweise auf eine solche Interpretation. Haspelmath (1989) zufolge ist der reine Infinitiv (mit der Markierung -en) aus einer Nominalform mit einer Interpretation als Akkusativ des Zwecks (mit gleicher Markierung -en) hervorgegangen.…”
Section: Grammatische Funktion Des Infinitivsunclassified