1988
DOI: 10.1139/v88-094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the free energy of nematic wetting layers

Abstract: . J. Chem. 66,553 (1988).The contributions to the free energy of a nematic wetting layer as a function of its thickness 1 are analyzed. The longest-range contribution is due to distortion of the nematic director across the film, resulting from different preferred molecular orientations at the two interfaces bounding the film. Van der Waals forces as well as the decaying tails of the interfacial order-parameter profiles yield contributions to the free energy of successively shorter range. These effects lead to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For systems with C in the range 1.0-1.6, however, we find that the best fit to our data is Γ ∝ ln t. This logarithmic growth, is due to the exponential decay of the order parameter profiles. Within the experimental temperature range, we observe a crossover between the logarithmic and power law behaviours [11] for the systems with the largest values of C, i.e. the complete-wetting scaling region increases with C, as expected.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For systems with C in the range 1.0-1.6, however, we find that the best fit to our data is Γ ∝ ln t. This logarithmic growth, is due to the exponential decay of the order parameter profiles. Within the experimental temperature range, we observe a crossover between the logarithmic and power law behaviours [11] for the systems with the largest values of C, i.e. the complete-wetting scaling region increases with C, as expected.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…If the nematic layer is sufficiently thick (larger than l 0 , with 10 −5 cm ≤ l 0 ≤ 10 −3 cm), the director will distort over the surface layer in order to yield the equilibrium orientations at both the NI and NV interfaces. Under these conditions, the nematic coverage has been shown to diverge as Γ ∝ t − 1 2 [11]. The largest layer thickness reported by Kasten and Strobl is l ≈ 200-250 Å [4], which is too small to allow for this type of distorsion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If the thickness of such a film grows arbitrarily large as T reduces to T IN then at T IN the nematic phase is said to completely wet the substrate isotropic interface. Detailed theoretical predictions are available for this behaviour [7]. Otherwise, this interface is only partially wet or non-wet by nematic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this set of parameters the tilt angle at the NV interface is 4 = 0 . Following an argument of Sullivan and Lipowsky [38], competing orientations at the NI and NV interfaces induce an elastic long-ranged repulsive interaction between them, which favors the growth of an N layer at the IV interface. For this system and within our numerical calculations we have been unable to verify this prediction, i.e.…”
Section: E Wetting Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 98%