1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4177(97)00003-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the frequency and isotope effect in sonochemistry

Abstract: In the first part of the work, it was observed, by a relative method, that the Weissler reaction and the Br2-catalysed isomerisation of maleic acid into fumaric acid are faster at 20 kHz than at 1.7 MHz. The difference between the relative reaction rates can be considered as small when the two order magnitude difference between the two frequencies is taking into account. In the second part of the work, the frequency effect associated to an isotope effect was studied. The Weissler reaction was performed in H2O … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interdependence cannot easily be studied experimentally in a nonlinear system like a cavitating liquid in a vessel containing an ultrasound emitter. So as to limit, but probably not eliminate, the risk of an artifact which could be due to an intensity difference at the two frequencies, the intensities at 1.7 MHz and 20 kHz were adjusted in our study in order to obtain the same rate for the Weissler reaction at both frequencies . Since the decay of the chemiluminescent signal and the acoustic relaxation seem to be correlated, it is reasonable to attribute the observed frequency effect to the wave production system even if the exact acoustic relaxation mechanism is not known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interdependence cannot easily be studied experimentally in a nonlinear system like a cavitating liquid in a vessel containing an ultrasound emitter. So as to limit, but probably not eliminate, the risk of an artifact which could be due to an intensity difference at the two frequencies, the intensities at 1.7 MHz and 20 kHz were adjusted in our study in order to obtain the same rate for the Weissler reaction at both frequencies . Since the decay of the chemiluminescent signal and the acoustic relaxation seem to be correlated, it is reasonable to attribute the observed frequency effect to the wave production system even if the exact acoustic relaxation mechanism is not known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the chemiluminescent results at 20 kHz and at 1.7 MHz, a previously described relative method was used. 14 The power output at both frequencies was adjusted in order to obtain the same rate for the Weissler reaction 15 carried out under air. A reactor similar to the one used for the physical measurements but without the lateral extensions was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade or so, there has been growing interest in the effect of frequency on acoustic cavitation and its associated sonochemical effects. ,, The main reason for this lies in the potential for enhancing a sonochemical effect for a given energy input to the system, with the wider aim of gaining a better understanding of the underlying cavitation process at different frequencies. However, many aspects of cavitation in the multibubble field change when the frequency of sonolysis is altered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it has become commonplace to compare sonochemical yields on the basis of constant calorimetric power input to the solution or less commonly, on the basis of constant electrical power input to the transducer. However, as described in detail elsewhere [1][2][3] such comparisons have very limited value for studies on the relationship between acoustic cavitation and sonochemical yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous attempts have been made at identifying specific sonochemical reactions with which ultrasound exposure apparatus could potentially be standardized [4][5][6][7], synonymous to the use of the Fricke dosimeter in radiation chemistry [8]. However, none of these studies address the underlying problem with quantitative sonochemistry, a problem that was first brought to light in relation to quantifying sonochemistry at varying ultrasound frequencies [1,2,9]. That is, "… no reliable relationship exists between the energy supplied to the system and the energy converted by the cavitation process in producing a sonochemical effect" [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%