2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2016.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the gauge-invariant operatorAmin2in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a review on the latter see [70], for recent progress within a BRST-invariant formulation see e.g. [71][72][73][74][75][76].…”
Section: E Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a review on the latter see [70], for recent progress within a BRST-invariant formulation see e.g. [71][72][73][74][75][76].…”
Section: E Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ξ a ≡ π a 0 m 2 . If we identify ξ a as a Stueckelberg field [40,41], then the expression (47) is the same as the obtained in [38,39], in which they have considered a field h = e igξ a S a (with S a being the generators of the gauge group SU(N)) acting on A a µ , in order to obtain an action put in a local form.…”
Section: Massive Su (N ) Yang-mills Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the issue of the gauge invariance for non-Abelian vector fields has been addressed in [36] where the dressing functions written in trems of infinite sum of non-local terms are used to define invariant quantities. Here we can mention that, for the non-Abelian Stückelberg mechanism with mass term, the invariance requeriment implies a non-polynomial action [37][38][39]. Therefore, it is natural to be expected that, unlike the Abelian cases, Yang-Mills models, whose gauge transformations depend on the covariant derivative, will generate invariant variables without truncations in the power series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%