2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the generation of exact solutions for evaluating numerical schemes and estimating discretization error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, at least for the unforced problem of Section 5.2, imposing physical boundary conditions accurately and stably at high Reynolds numbers is difficult, especially for the case of traction boundary conditions. To demonstrate the capability of the scheme for problems with characteristics of high Re flows (e.g., thin boundary layers), in Section 5.3 we also present steady solutions obtained by the method for the wellknown lid-driven cavity flow, along with a regularized version [36] of this problem.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, at least for the unforced problem of Section 5.2, imposing physical boundary conditions accurately and stably at high Reynolds numbers is difficult, especially for the case of traction boundary conditions. To demonstrate the capability of the scheme for problems with characteristics of high Re flows (e.g., thin boundary layers), in Section 5.3 we also present steady solutions obtained by the method for the wellknown lid-driven cavity flow, along with a regularized version [36] of this problem.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting function-based MNP approach described earlier used sophisticated spline fits which allowed for arbitrary levels of continuity across spline zone boundaries and could be readily extended to multiple dimensions. 21 However, the generation of such global functions is expensive and can lead to oscillations in regions with insufficient resolution. When using MNP/defect correction for discretization error estimation purposes, global fits are likely not necessary, so the use of local fits will also be explored.…”
Section: Continuous Defect Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21) The flow field is defined as a function of variables at the inner radius of the annulus denoted by the subscript i. For the problems examined herein, the inner radius, , is 2.0, the outer radius is 3.0, the inner density, , is 1.0 kg/m 3 , and the inner Mach number, , is 2.0.…”
Section: Supersonic Vortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the discretization error is u u h h− = ε (17) and thus we can rewrite Equation (16) as…”
Section: Relationship Between Truncation Error and Discretization mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This spline fitting approach has been used to develop continuous approximations of 2D heat transfer and Navier-Stokes CFD simulations by Roy and Sinclair 17 and is referred to as the Method of Nearby Problems (MNP). The MNP curve fitting procedure involves breaking the numerical solution up into overlapping zones that are approximated with local least squares polynomial fits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%