2015
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the generation of tangential ground motion by underground explosions in jointed rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum motion is observed in the direction of the maximum shear stress (at 45 ∘ to the principal stress directions). As it was shown in Vorobiev et al (2015Vorobiev et al ( , 2017, joint-driven mechanism very often produces maximum tangential velocity and displacement magnitudes during the second phase of the pulse when polarity of the motion changes because initial shock wave compression is followed by a unloading wave. Because the joint strength is smaller during unloading, more joints start to slide, and since the radial velocity changes sign, so does the tangential.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Two Mechanisms Of Shear Wave Generationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum motion is observed in the direction of the maximum shear stress (at 45 ∘ to the principal stress directions). As it was shown in Vorobiev et al (2015Vorobiev et al ( , 2017, joint-driven mechanism very often produces maximum tangential velocity and displacement magnitudes during the second phase of the pulse when polarity of the motion changes because initial shock wave compression is followed by a unloading wave. Because the joint strength is smaller during unloading, more joints start to slide, and since the radial velocity changes sign, so does the tangential.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Two Mechanisms Of Shear Wave Generationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The joints have properties distinct from the material properties. Detailed description of the constitutive laws used for the joints is given in Hurley et al (2017) and Vorobiev et al (2015).…”
Section: Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focussed on the anisotropic influence of multiple joint sets on the response of rock by specifying the rock medium to be isotropic, which is a reasonable assumption in the near field . Future work is planned to generalize the model to include general elastic anisotropy to be able to more accurately capture anisotropic elastic wave propagation far from the explosive source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of models have been developed for jointed rocks (eg, Sayers and Kachanov and Tsvankin and Grechka, but most of them are limited to elastic seismic wave propagation. These elastic models cannot simulate the nonlinearity controlling anisotropic joint slippage observed in mesoscale simulations near the source of the explosion (eg, Vorobiev et al and Vorobiev.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of preexisting stress in the medium, the explosion can release tectonic elastic strain throughout the damaged zone around the cavity [ Press and Archambeau , ; Toksoz et al , ; Wallace et al , ; Stevens and Thompson , ] or by triggering a nearby earthquake [ Aki et al , ; Aki and Tsai , ], which also leads to shear waves generation. Moreover, interesting numerical experiments tend to show that sliding of discrete rock masses at joints under the effect of the stress wave could be the origin of tangential components of motion [ Heuzé et al , ; Vorobiev et al , ], which can also be compared to observations in the far‐field by using coupling techniques between hydrodynamic modeling and elastic modeling [ Pitarka et al , ].…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%