2008
DOI: 10.5802/jtnb.633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the generation of the coefficient field of a newform by a single Hecke eigenvalue

Abstract: Let f be a non-CM newform of weight k ≥ 2. Let L be a subfield of the coefficient field of f . We completely settle the question of the density of the set of primes p such that the p-th coefficient of f generates the field L. This density is determined by the inner twists of f . As a particular case, we obtain that in the absence of non-trivial inner twists, the density is 1 for L equal to the whole coefficient field. We also present some new data on reducibility of Hecke polynomials, which suggest questions f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a precise definition and results related to inner twists see e.g. [51,52,40,35]. For the sake of clarity we give a simple example of the situation for holomorphic modular forms.…”
Section: Corollary 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a precise definition and results related to inner twists see e.g. [51,52,40,35]. For the sake of clarity we give a simple example of the situation for holomorphic modular forms.…”
Section: Corollary 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If ρ comes from a newform f = ∞ n=1 a n q n of weight 2 that does not have complex multiplication nor any non-trivial inner twists, then Im(ρ) has connected Zariskiclosure (at least for all but finitely many ) by Theorem 3.1 of [12] (see also [11]). Thus our Corollary 2.3 implies Corollary 1 of [8]. However, we have not studied any proper subfields of E such as 'Q(a 2 n /χ(n) : (n, N ) = 1)' in [8], and so we cannot recover the main results of [8] in full generality.…”
Section: Statements Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus our Corollary 2.3 implies Corollary 1 of [8]. However, we have not studied any proper subfields of E such as 'Q(a 2 n /χ(n) : (n, N ) = 1)' in [8], and so we cannot recover the main results of [8] in full generality.…”
Section: Statements Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark. The set of primes p with F f = Q(a 2 p /ε f (p)) has density 1 (see [16,Theorem 1]), so one can expect that the condition on λ ′ is almost always satisfied. In any case we do have an embedding…”
Section: Finding the Correct Formmentioning
confidence: 99%