2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1028335806060012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the geometric approach to the formulation of the standard model

Abstract: Abstract. A geometric interpretation of the spontaneous symmetry breaking effect, which plays a key role in the Standard Model, is developed. The advocated approach is related to the effective use of the momentum 4-spaces of the constant curvature, de Sitter and anti de Sitter, in the apparatus of quantum field theory.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, using the designation m/m max = sinμ, we can see that (32) and (33) for the case of upper signs become the expressions m 1 = 2m max sinμ/2 and m 2 = 2m max sin 2 μ/2, while for the case of lower signs they turn into m 3 = ν 1 2m max cosμ/2 and m 4 = 2m max cos 2 μ/2, which is in a complete agreement with (11). As has been already noted, with identification of the parameter m max and the parameter of maximal mass M used in the geomet ric approach (see, e.g., [5,6]) a full correspondence between the parameters that are used in Hamiltonians and in equations of motion of the models under study can be obtained. Additionally, with M ∞, we can see that the anti de Sitter geom etry does not differ from the Minkowski geometry in the pseudo Euclidean p space.…”
Section: Non Hermitian Relativisticsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, using the designation m/m max = sinμ, we can see that (32) and (33) for the case of upper signs become the expressions m 1 = 2m max sinμ/2 and m 2 = 2m max sin 2 μ/2, while for the case of lower signs they turn into m 3 = ν 1 2m max cosμ/2 and m 4 = 2m max cos 2 μ/2, which is in a complete agreement with (11). As has been already noted, with identification of the parameter m max and the parameter of maximal mass M used in the geomet ric approach (see, e.g., [5,6]) a full correspondence between the parameters that are used in Hamiltonians and in equations of motion of the models under study can be obtained. Additionally, with M ∞, we can see that the anti de Sitter geom etry does not differ from the Minkowski geometry in the pseudo Euclidean p space.…”
Section: Non Hermitian Relativisticsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Kadys hevskii et al on the basis of the geometric approach [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Non Hermitian Relativisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations