On the geometry of entangled states

Abstract

The basic question that is addressed in this paper is finding the closest separable state for a given entangled state, measured with the Hilbert Schmidt distance. While this problem is in general very hard, we show that the following strongly related problem can be solved: find the Hilbert Schmidt distance of an entangled state to the set of all partially transposed states. We prove that this latter distance can be expressed as a function of the negative eigenvalues of the partial transpose of the entangled state, and show how it is related to the distance of a state to the set of positive partially transposed states (PPT-states). We illustrate this by calculating the closest biseparable state to the W-state, and give a simple and very general proof for the fact that the set of W-type states is not of measure zero. Next we show that all surfaces with states whose partial transposes have constant minimal negative eigenvalue are similar to the boundary of PPT states. We illustrate this with some examples on bipartite qubit states, where contours of constant negativity are plotted on two-dimensional intersections of the complete state space. 03.65.Bz

Entanglement detection

“…3 We say a density matrix ̺ has a positive 2 A quantitative study on the shape of these sets in space where the coordinates are the density matrix elements is given in Ref. [48]. 3 Note that this also holds for the full transposition.…”

Entanglement versus Bell Violations and Their Behavior under Local Filtering Operations

“…Proof: We will use similar techniques as used in [12,13,14], where it was shown that surfaces of constant concurrence can be generated by transformingR →R ′ = L 1R L T 2 by left and right multiplication with proper orthochronous Lorentz transformations, taken into account the constraint that the (0, 0) element ofR (representing the trace of ρ) does not change under these transformations. They leave the Lorentz singular values [13] invariant, and the concurrence is a function of these four parameters only.…”

Optimal entanglement witnesses for qubits and qutrits

“…In general it is not easy to find the correct state ρ 0 which minimizes the distance (for specific procedures, see, e.g., Refs. [32,33,34]). However, we can use an operator like in Eq.…”