2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fuzzy.2011.6007309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the geometry of join and meet calculations for general type-2 fuzzy sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison between two IT2F numbers we have used their rank values. Centroid ranking method (Mendel, 2011) has been used to find the value of rank.…”
Section: Uncertainty Handling With It2fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison between two IT2F numbers we have used their rank values. Centroid ranking method (Mendel, 2011) has been used to find the value of rank.…”
Section: Uncertainty Handling With It2fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual figures are compared next. The literature has a variety of ranking techniques (Lee and Chen, 2008;Mendel, 2011;Chiao, 2012). The centroid ranking method (Karnik and Mendel, 2001) is employed in this work to compare the IT2FSs.…”
Section: Uncertainty Handling With It2fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from the field of computational geometry; yet convexity remained a necessary condition. More recent works [5], [6], [7] studied the geometrical properties of some GT2FSs to find closed formulas or approximations for the join and meet operations in some specific cases. However, to the best of the authors knowledge, considering arbitrary secondary grades, which can be non-convex, has not been addressed to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers have been published about different kinds of computations for a GT2 FS (e.g., operations[9],[13]-[15],[17],[22],[37],[41],[44],[48],[51],[52],[55],[57],[60],[63]; centroid/type-reduction[23],[30],[31],[37],[48],[70],[73],[75],[77]; defuzzification[18],[29],[63]; solving fuzzy equations[61]; uncertainty measures[76]; and, similarity[19]). For such studies, the nature of the representation of a GT2 FS is usually not a vital issue; therefore, when we discard a particular representation in this paper, we are in no way disparaging those earlier works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%