1986
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80292-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the ground-state tautomerization of 3-hydroxyflavone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous IR results, 15 The Raman spectra of 3-HF have been considered in more detail in previous studies. 34,35 To facilitate comparison with the other molecules, we have abstracted some of the results here.…”
Section: -Hydroxyflavonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to previous IR results, 15 The Raman spectra of 3-HF have been considered in more detail in previous studies. 34,35 To facilitate comparison with the other molecules, we have abstracted some of the results here.…”
Section: -Hydroxyflavonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 -20 Unlike in flavone where the carbonyl absorption is at 1649 cm 1 , in 3-HF its wavenumber is lowered to 1610 cm 1 which overlaps with the C C band. The IR spectra in the C-H and O-H stretching region were reported differently in various works, 10,15,16 in which researchers concluded that there is no strong hydrogen bonding in 3-HF, as opposed to the 5-hydroxyflavone (5-HF) molecule. The hydroxyl stretching absorption was found at 3350 cm 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BDE of 6OH is also almost unaffected by the torsion. Energy difference between the ground states of 3-hydroxyflavone and its tautomer is almost of 50 kJ mol -1 but ultrafast spectroscopy experiments confirmed that the first excited state of 3OH spontaneously forms excited state tautomer followed by the decay to the tautomer ground state (Dzugan et al, 1986). Significant difference in energy of HOMO, LUMO as well as their energy gap can be seen comparing the ground state of 3OH with t3OH (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is striking that the rate for the reverse proton transfer (GSRPT) of 3-HF was reported to be more than 6 orders of magnitude slower than the rate of the excited-state forward proton transfer. A controversial report of Aartsma and co-workers, 22 which contradicted the previous study 19 of Itoh et al, determined a lower limit of 3 × 10 10 s -1 for the rate of the reverse proton transfer by means of picosecond time-resolved absorption spectroscopy coupled with a stimulated emission pumping, SEP, technique. Another indication of fast reverse PT was a 60 fs lifetime for GSRPT found by Brucker and Kelly from the emission line-width for argon matrix isolated non-solvated 3-HF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%