1970
DOI: 10.2307/2036752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Growth of Certain Meromorphic Solutions of Arbitrary Second Order Algebraic Differential Equations

Abstract: Abstract.In this note, we present two results concerning meromorphic functions on the whole finite plane, which are solutions of algebraic differential equations (i.e., equations of the form U(z, y, dy/dz, ■ ■ ■ , d"y/dz") =0, where U is a polynomial in z, y, dy/dz, ■ ■ ■ , dny/dzn).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bank proved in [4] that if a meromorphic solution f of (1.3) satisfies N (r, a j , f) = O(e r c ) for a j , j = 1, 2 belongs to the extended complex planeĈ where c is some positive constant, then f satisfies (1.4). This result improved upon Bank's own result [3] where a weaker assumption that N (r, a j , f) = O(r c ) for a j , j = 1, 2 is assumed. In fact, Gol'dberg [7] proved a stronger result for a special subclass of (1.9).…”
Section: Theorem 12 (Steinmetz) Suppose That Insupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Bank proved in [4] that if a meromorphic solution f of (1.3) satisfies N (r, a j , f) = O(e r c ) for a j , j = 1, 2 belongs to the extended complex planeĈ where c is some positive constant, then f satisfies (1.4). This result improved upon Bank's own result [3] where a weaker assumption that N (r, a j , f) = O(r c ) for a j , j = 1, 2 is assumed. In fact, Gol'dberg [7] proved a stronger result for a special subclass of (1.9).…”
Section: Theorem 12 (Steinmetz) Suppose That Insupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In our first result of this paper (Theorem 1), we answer this question in the affirmative even for those meromorphic functions g for which T(r, g)/(r(log r)) tends to 0 on a sequence {/•"} -» +oo. An important tool used in the proof is a result of the author which was first proved in [1], and then improved in [2, §4]. This result sets forth an estimate for the growth of a meromorphic solution y(z) of an algebraic differential equation F = 0, having meromorphic coefficients, in terms of the growth of the coefficients and the counting functions for the distinct zeros and distinct poles of y(z), provided that y(z) is not a solution of some equation F q = 0, where F tl denotes the homogeneous part of F of total degree q in the indeterminates y, y ' , .…”
Section: T(ry) = R(logr)/7t+o(r)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now if ^ = F / r , then it is easily verified [see 5, Lemma 3.5, p. 73], that for each 7=Sl, r O ) /r can be written as a polynomial in *&,"¥',... ," l ¥ ( ' 1) , with constant coefficients. Hence, if we divide both the numerator and denominator of the quotient on the right side of (14) by T q , we obtain the conclusion of Theorem 2.…”
Section: T M (Z)) (14)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are now able to complete the proof of the Lemma. Coming back to equation (1) we remember that F(z, w, w', . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%