2019
DOI: 10.26493/1855-3974.1610.03d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Hamilton-Waterloo problem: the case of two cycles sizes of different parity

Abstract: The Hamilton-Waterloo problem asks for a decomposition of the complete graph into r copies of a 2-factor F 1 and s copies of a 2-factor F 2 such that r + s = v−1 2 . If F 1 consists of m-cycles and F 2 consists of n cycles, then we call such a decomposition a (m, n)−HWP(v; r, s). The goal is to find a decomposition for every possible pair (r, s). In this paper, we show that for odd x and y, there is a (2 k x, y) − HWP(vm; r, s) if gcd(x, y) ≥ 3, m ≥ 3, and both x and y divide v, except possibly when 1 ∈ {r, s}. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When m and n have opposite parities, less is known. The paper [10] solves this problem when m | n, v > 6n > 36m and β ≥ 3; further results for cycle lengths of opposite parities can be found in [21]. The case (m, n) = (3, 4) is completely solved [5,14,26,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When m and n have opposite parities, less is known. The paper [10] solves this problem when m | n, v > 6n > 36m and β ≥ 3; further results for cycle lengths of opposite parities can be found in [21]. The case (m, n) = (3, 4) is completely solved [5,14,26,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A somewhat more restrictive result on HWP(Kn;T1,T2;α,γ) for uniform 2‐factor types T1 and T2, with exactly one of them bipartite, is proved in [31, Theorem 1.2]. The same authors also have solutions to HWP(Kn;T1,T2;α,γ) for certain nonuniform 2‐factor types [30, Corollary 10.9], and some of these cases involve exactly one bipartite 2‐factor type.…”
Section: The Hamilton–waterloo Problem For Complete Multigraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many solutions to HWP(Kn×m;T1,T2;α1,α2) with T1 and T2 both of uniform types were found in [5,14,16,31]. As far as we can tell, the only results for nonuniform 2‐factors are found in [30]; the authors obtained extensive solutions for the complete equipartite graphs Kn×m with n odd, assuming the parameters satisfy some tedious arithmetic conditions.…”
Section: The Hamilton–waterloo Problem For Complete Equipartite Multigraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A somewhat more restrictive result on HW P (K n ; T 1 , T 2 ; α, γ) for uniform 2-factor types T 1 and T 2 , with exactly one of them bipartite, is proved in [27,Theorem 1.2]. The same authors also have solutions to HW P (K n ; T 1 , T 2 ; α, γ) for certain non-uniform 2-factor types [26, Corollary 10.9], and some of these cases involve exactly one bipartite 2-factor type.…”
Section: The Hamilton-waterloo Problem For Complete Multigraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many solutions to HW P (K n×m ; T 1 , T 2 ; α 1 , α 2 ) with T 1 and T 2 both of uniform types were found in [5,14,16,27]. As far as we can tell, the only results for non-uniform 2-factors are found in [26]; the authors obtained extensive solutions for the complete equipartite graphs K n×m with n odd, assuming the parameters satisfy some tedious arithmetic conditions.…”
Section: The Hamilton-waterloo Problem For Complete Equipartite Multi...mentioning
confidence: 99%