2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.956882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the hardness of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems

Abstract: We use exact enumeration to characterize the solutions of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems of less than 21 variables in terms of their distributions of Hamming distances to close-by solutions. We also perform experiments with the D-Wave Advantage 5.1 quantum annealer, solving many instances of up to 170-variable, quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Our results demonstrate that the exponents characterizing the success probability of a D-Wave annealer to solve a quadratic un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous researches have illustrated that only by containing the configurations in the training datasets that are close to the ground state, measured by Hamming distance, to train the neural networks, may we obtain the ground state after training [4][5][6][7]. Therefore, we design this regularizer to explore the relationship between the Hamming distance and the success rates of finding the ground state for different network architectures combined with VAN.…”
Section: The Hamming Distance Regularizermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The previous researches have illustrated that only by containing the configurations in the training datasets that are close to the ground state, measured by Hamming distance, to train the neural networks, may we obtain the ground state after training [4][5][6][7]. Therefore, we design this regularizer to explore the relationship between the Hamming distance and the success rates of finding the ground state for different network architectures combined with VAN.…”
Section: The Hamming Distance Regularizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the results on the WPE, the success rates are pretty high because it is easier to find the ground state of the SK model than the WPE with the same system size (when the WPE with α = 0.2). The difference in the success rates between the WPE and the SK model may be caused by their diverse distribution of the Hamming distance between excited states and the ground state [6,7]. Also, when the value of z is large, the VAN framework based on GNN has the highest success rates, indicating that it has the strongest generalization capabilities.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is very well possible that many states in the first excited sector have a large Hamming distance to the ground state and between themselves. In fact, there are many indications that a large Hamming distance between the ground state and the first excited state(s) is common for hard instances [6,63]. The order of the perturbation theory is then accordingly large and the convergence difficult to analyze.…”
Section: A Sherrington-kirkpatrick Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%