2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10958-023-06356-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Hilbert problem for semi-linear Beltrami equations

Abstract: The presented paper is devoted to the study of the well-known Hilbert boundary-value problem for semi-linear Beltrami equations with arbitrary boundary data that are measurable with respect to logarithmic capacity. Namely, we prove here the corresponding results on the existence, regularity, and representation of its nonclassical solutions with a geometric interpretation of boundary values as the angular (along the nontangential paths) limits in comparison with the classical approach in PDE. For this purpose, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…see Corollary 4.1.8 and Th eorem 4.2.1 in [12], the existence of a holomorphic function A u iv D C      (unique up to an additive pure imaginary constant) in an arbitrary bounded simple connected domain D and the factorization h f    of solutions of (2) in terms of suitable generalized analytic functions with sources, see Lemma 1 and Remark 2 in [13] for the uniformly elliptic case. Th e existence of the given   conformal mapping f follows from Proposition 1; see further details of the proof in [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Corollary 4.1.8 and Th eorem 4.2.1 in [12], the existence of a holomorphic function A u iv D C      (unique up to an additive pure imaginary constant) in an arbitrary bounded simple connected domain D and the factorization h f    of solutions of (2) in terms of suitable generalized analytic functions with sources, see Lemma 1 and Remark 2 in [13] for the uniformly elliptic case. Th e existence of the given   conformal mapping f follows from Proposition 1; see further details of the proof in [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%