2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2004.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the homotopy type of the Quillen complex of finite soluble groups

Abstract: We prove that the homotopy type of the Quillen complex of a finite soluble group at the prime p = 2 is that of a wedge of spheres of possible different dimensions.  2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [6], Fumagalli claimed that Question 1.1 has a positive answer if the group G is solvable. Unfortunately, his proof relies on a result that turns out to be false (see [2]), so that to our knowledge the following question seems to remain opened.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], Fumagalli claimed that Question 1.1 has a positive answer if the group G is solvable. Unfortunately, his proof relies on a result that turns out to be false (see [2]), so that to our knowledge the following question seems to remain opened.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], Fumagalli studies such upper intervals and claims to have proved that if p is an odd prime and G is a solvable group, then the poset A p (G) is homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres [4,Theorem 21]. A crucial step in the proof, namely [4,Lemmas 19 and 20], relies heavily on a particular fiber theorem [4,Corollary 5], which unfortunately turns out to be false.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial step in the proof, namely [4,Lemmas 19 and 20], relies heavily on a particular fiber theorem [4,Corollary 5], which unfortunately turns out to be false. The aim of this note is to provide two counterexamples to [4,Corollary 5]. The second one will also serve as a counterexample to the wedge decomposition formula obtained by Fumagalli in the proof of his Lemma 19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations