1956
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177728181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Hypothesis of No "Interaction" In a Multi-way Contingency Table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norton [21] extended the definition to test a 2 × 2 × K table. Roy and Kastenbaum [27] constructed a likelihood ratio test for testing no second-order interaction in the full table I × J × K , that is to say…”
Section: Further Hypotheses Of Interest In Three-way Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norton [21] extended the definition to test a 2 × 2 × K table. Roy and Kastenbaum [27] constructed a likelihood ratio test for testing no second-order interaction in the full table I × J × K , that is to say…”
Section: Further Hypotheses Of Interest In Three-way Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , s; k = 1, 2, ..., t. Roy and Kastenbaum [15] suggested that the generalization to r X s X t case, as an extension of the criterion for zero second-order interaction in a 2 X 2 X 2 case due to Bartlett, is to test the hypothesis H : Aijk = A ; j t ; 2 = 1, 2, ' * * , r -1;…”
Section: R X S X T Contingency Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odoroff compares small sample hypothesis of no interaction in 2 x 2 x 2 tables. Roy properties of tests for interactions in 2 X 2 X 2 and and Kastenbaum [15] proposed an extension of Bartlett's 3 X 2 X 2 tables. He examined each of the three tests, definition for T X s x t tables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some further discussion of the analysis of multi-way cross classifications, the reader is also referred to reference [28] and to the literature cited there. APPENDIX Let us assume that the time series considered are of the general type defined in Section 3 herein.…”
Section: The Relation Between Three or More Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%