2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-4689zool-20160088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphological terminology and orientation of aedeagus used in the descriptions follow Biffi (2016) The type specimens of all Malthesis species have been examined. The distribution of the species given in the catalog is based on data from their original descriptions, the type specimens' labels, and from subsequent published sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological terminology and orientation of aedeagus used in the descriptions follow Biffi (2016) The type specimens of all Malthesis species have been examined. The distribution of the species given in the catalog is based on data from their original descriptions, the type specimens' labels, and from subsequent published sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Está dividida em cinco subfamílias, apenas a primeira não está registrada no Brasil: Cantharinae, Chauliognathinae, Dys-morphocerinae, Malthininae e Silinae. Referências: Delkeskamp (1977), Brancucci (1980Brancucci ( , 1981, Constantin (2008Constantin ( , 2010Constantin ( , 2020, Biffi (2015Biffi ( , 2016Biffi ( , 2017Biffi ( , 2019, Biffi & Casari (2017), Biffi & Constantin (2018a, b) e Biffi & Geiser (2020).…”
Section: (5)unclassified
“…Within the Neotropical fauna of Cantharidae Imhoff, 1856, there are two particularly diverse and taxonomically difficult genera, Discodon Gorham, 1881, with nearly 400 currently valid species, and Chauliognathus Hentz, 1830, with over 450 (Delkeskamp 1977;Constantin 2015Constantin , 2016. While the taxonomic problems relating to the latter are gradually being tackled in some recent publications (Biffi 2016;Constantin 2016), Discodon still remains poorly studied. Only two regional revisions exist: that of Constantin (2015) dealing with the fauna of French Guiana, and the much older and now heavily outdated one by Champion (1915) dealing with Central America.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%