IEEE VTS 53rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Spring 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37202)
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2001.944640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the impact of soft decision functions on the performance of multistage parallel interference cancelers for CDMA systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is subtracted from the output of the time-domain combiner, given by (7) where the superscript of stands for the th stage, and is the soft data decision. The resultant signals are then combined in frequency-domain with the MMSE technique.…”
Section: Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is subtracted from the output of the time-domain combiner, given by (7) where the superscript of stands for the th stage, and is the soft data decision. The resultant signals are then combined in frequency-domain with the MMSE technique.…”
Section: Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the tentative decisions are wrong, the MCI will be increased considerably from error propagation, actually doubled for binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) modulation. In order to improve the system performance with hard decisions, a soft-decision function [7] should be used to regenerate MCI. The soft MCI cancellation approach is more complex, but it can provide better performance over the hard one by alleviating the effect of error propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effective codes might be used in place of the unknown actual codes, since the actual symbol estimates and their powers are not necessary as long as the pseudo-symbols are treated linearly in interference cancellation. However, knowing or detecting the actual codes is an opportunity for exploiting hard or hyperbolic-tangent non-linearities (or even channel decoding and encoding) to refine their symbol estimates [10,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudocodes might be used in place of the unknown actual codes since the actual symbol estimates and their powers are not necessary as long as the pseudo-symbols are treated linearly in interference cancellation. However, knowing or detecting the actual codes is an opportunity for exploiting hard or hyperbolic-tangent nonlinearities or even channel decoding and encoding to refine their symbol estimates [11], [12]. In the latter case, one can pass between the symbol blocks of known codes and their pseudo-equivalents at SF-256 by properly dimensioned FWHTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%