2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2008
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2008.5074799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the implications of Analog-to-Digital Conversion on variable-rate BandPass Sampling GNSS receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Down-converting an RF signal to an IF by employing subsampling results in a poorer Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) compared with that from performing a down-conversion with an RF mixer (Pekau and Haslett, 2006). In order to minimize the out-of-band noise at the output of the ADC, subsampling receivers impose stringent requirements on the selectivity of the Anti-Aliasing (AA) filters preceding A/D conversion (Ucar et al, 2008). An opportunity for a reduced complexity solution emerges when the GNSS spectrum, as illustrated in Figure 3 …”
Section: R F F R O N T -E N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Down-converting an RF signal to an IF by employing subsampling results in a poorer Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) compared with that from performing a down-conversion with an RF mixer (Pekau and Haslett, 2006). In order to minimize the out-of-band noise at the output of the ADC, subsampling receivers impose stringent requirements on the selectivity of the Anti-Aliasing (AA) filters preceding A/D conversion (Ucar et al, 2008). An opportunity for a reduced complexity solution emerges when the GNSS spectrum, as illustrated in Figure 3 …”
Section: R F F R O N T -E N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%