1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0362-546x(97)00572-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the index theories for second order Hamiltonian systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that simultaneously published with the topological extension of results in [3] and [18] to the degenerate Hamiltonian systems in [9] of 1990, the Conley-Zehnder's index theory for non-degenerate symplectic paths in [3] was also extended to the degenerate Hamiltonian systems by an analytic method of C. Viterbo in [22]. Note also that when x is a solution of a second order Hamiltonian system, Theorem 1.4 is proved in [1] by a rather simple variational method. Note also that when x is a solution of a second order Hamiltonian system, Theorem 1.4 is proved in [1] by a rather simple variational method.…”
Section: Hyperbolic Extremals In the Calculus Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that simultaneously published with the topological extension of results in [3] and [18] to the degenerate Hamiltonian systems in [9] of 1990, the Conley-Zehnder's index theory for non-degenerate symplectic paths in [3] was also extended to the degenerate Hamiltonian systems by an analytic method of C. Viterbo in [22]. Note also that when x is a solution of a second order Hamiltonian system, Theorem 1.4 is proved in [1] by a rather simple variational method. Note also that when x is a solution of a second order Hamiltonian system, Theorem 1.4 is proved in [1] by a rather simple variational method.…”
Section: Hyperbolic Extremals In the Calculus Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(3) The right equality of (1.4) holds for some m>1 if and only if there holds I 2p h N 1 (1,1) h r h K # 0 0 (#({)) for some non-negative integers p and r satisfying p+r n and some K # Sp(2(n& p&r)) with _(K)/U"R satisfying the following conditions:…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If m=2, there holds (&I 2s ) h N 1 (&1, 1) h t h H # 0 0 (K) for some non-negative integers s and t satisfying 0 s+t n& p&r, and some H # Sp(2(n& p&r&s&t)) satisfying _(H)/U"R and that all elements in (2) The inequality (1.3) in Theorem 1.1 was first proved in our other paper [13]. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the equalities in Theorem 1.1 are new.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations