2022 DGON Inertial Sensors and Systems (ISS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iss55898.2022.9926342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Influence of Sample Rate, Calibration, and Allan Variance Parameters on the Accuracy of ZUPT-Based Pedestrian Navigation with MEMS IMUs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the results did not change the assessment of the current literature: ZARU is applicable only in pronounced resting phases of the IMU, and a significant advantage of the Gauss-Markov modelling is not visible. Further research should address the IMU sampling rate and IMU calibration (as already done by the authors [75]) the usage of other data fusion techniques like an unscented Kalman filter or like smoothing, advanced detection of ZUPT phases, dual IMU configurations etc.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the results did not change the assessment of the current literature: ZARU is applicable only in pronounced resting phases of the IMU, and a significant advantage of the Gauss-Markov modelling is not visible. Further research should address the IMU sampling rate and IMU calibration (as already done by the authors [75]) the usage of other data fusion techniques like an unscented Kalman filter or like smoothing, advanced detection of ZUPT phases, dual IMU configurations etc.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%