2011
DOI: 10.1007/bf03379933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Inherent Incompleteness of Scientific Theories

Abstract: * __________________________________________________________________________________________We examine the question of whether scientific theories can ever be complete. For two closely related reasons, we will argue that they cannot. The first reason is the inability to determine what are "valid empirical observations", a result that is based on a self-reference Gödel/Tarski-like proof. The second reason is the existence of "meta-empirical" evidence of the inherent incompleteness of observations. These reasons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gödel, Popper etc.) [18]. Many other data sets, and improving/improved data quality, could increase the utility, accuracy and actionability of this modelling approach.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gödel, Popper etc.) [18]. Many other data sets, and improving/improved data quality, could increase the utility, accuracy and actionability of this modelling approach.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing and considering them as incomprehensible has made the theory of electromagnetism possible. We will not address the aspect of incompleteness of scientific theories (see, for example, [50]), which refer to the incompleteness of mathematics, as introduced above.…”
Section: Incomprehensibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%