Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3412841.3442011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the instability of embeddings for recommender systems

Abstract: Most state-of-the-art top-N collaborative recommender systems work by learning embeddings to jointly represent users and items. Learned embeddings are considered to be effective to solve a variety of tasks. Among others, providing and explaining recommendations. In this paper we question the reliability of the embeddings learned by Matrix Factorization (MF). We empirically demonstrate that, by simply changing the initial values assigned to the latent factors, the same MF method generates very different embeddi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated factors are used for prediction of ratings of known users for known items and for filling the sparse matrix A with unknown values. However, the algorithm we used was critiqued by [18] for its instability, mostly due to a phenomenon called 'popularity bias' where popular items are rated more often, while unpopular items are rarely rated. However, due to the nature of our dataset, we can plausibly excluded the popularity bias.…”
Section: Latent Value Extraction With Svdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated factors are used for prediction of ratings of known users for known items and for filling the sparse matrix A with unknown values. However, the algorithm we used was critiqued by [18] for its instability, mostly due to a phenomenon called 'popularity bias' where popular items are rated more often, while unpopular items are rarely rated. However, due to the nature of our dataset, we can plausibly excluded the popularity bias.…”
Section: Latent Value Extraction With Svdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tavsiyeleri ve temsilleri destekleyen bilgi miktarını genişletmek için yaygın MF yaklaşımının NNMF varyantlarını tanımlanmıştır. Beş farklı veri kümesi üzerinde kapsamlı deneyler gerçekleştirilmiştir [22].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified