2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0219025716500302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the integral kernels of derivatives of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck semigroup

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a closed-form expression for the integral kernels associated with the derivatives of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup e tL . Our approach is to expand the Mehler kernel into Hermite polynomials and applying the powers L N of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator to it, where we exploit the fact that the Hermite polynomials are eigenfunctions for L. As an application we give an alternative proof of the kernel estimates by [11], making all relevant quantities explicit.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the same argument, we can prove failure of L p (γ)-L q (γ) off-diagonal estimates for the derivatives (L m e tL ) m∈N of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup, with the same conditions on (p, q, t) and the same class of testing sets (E, F). This relies on an identification of the kernel of L m e tL , which has been done by the second author in [12].…”
Section: Lower Bounds and Negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the same argument, we can prove failure of L p (γ)-L q (γ) off-diagonal estimates for the derivatives (L m e tL ) m∈N of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup, with the same conditions on (p, q, t) and the same class of testing sets (E, F). This relies on an identification of the kernel of L m e tL , which has been done by the second author in [12].…”
Section: Lower Bounds and Negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that some signs in the expression of [31,Theorem 5.1] are not correct. The new corrected equality is the following…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 (I) For 1mentioning
confidence: 99%