2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00426-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interaction between ultrasound and contrast agents during Doppler investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coherence of the doppler signal was maintained over 204 ± 5 pulses for an acoustic pressure of 126 kPa at a PrF of 6 kHz, which indicates that the correlation of the microbubble echo should be high enough for accurate doppler analysis if the mI is kept low (mI < 0.06 in this case). radiation pressure can also push the microbubbles out of the field of view, which can further decorrelate the doppler signal [28]. The push from radiation pressure causes the oscillation in the autocorrelation function seen in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The coherence of the doppler signal was maintained over 204 ± 5 pulses for an acoustic pressure of 126 kPa at a PrF of 6 kHz, which indicates that the correlation of the microbubble echo should be high enough for accurate doppler analysis if the mI is kept low (mI < 0.06 in this case). radiation pressure can also push the microbubbles out of the field of view, which can further decorrelate the doppler signal [28]. The push from radiation pressure causes the oscillation in the autocorrelation function seen in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In later sections, we deduce parameter values that are more suitable to describe the observed F04E bubble behavior. The microbubbles have acoustic properties similar to albumin-shelled contrast agents [43], but they are chemically very stable and pressure resistant, which makes them ideal for bubble model validation. For optimal mixing, one drop of surfactant (Symperonic N, BDH Laboratory, Poole, UK) was added, after which the emulsion was gently stirred with a magnetic stirrer for at least 30 minutes.…”
Section: A Microbubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results have shown that, when such translations are related to full populations of contrast agents suspended in moving fluids, they may yield to considerable distortions in the corresponding Doppler spectra [4], [5]. A Doppler approach was used to indirectly validate a simple theoretical model, in which the microbubble movements are evaluated through the combination of the primary US force with the drag force of the fluid in which they are suspended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%