2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-020-1593-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Interaction of Galactic Cosmic Rays with Heliospheric Shocks During Forbush Decreases

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the graph V(t) reveals a slight depletion before the main rise of V. The graph CR(t) shows the pre-CIR slight increase in CR in more detail (e.g., Lockwood 1971), which is hereafter denoted as "nose". As we show below, the nose is most likely a consequence of the pre-event phase of the decreased V and the steep magnetic field gradient related to the compression caused by the interaction of the fast and slow solar wind (Kirin et al 2020).…”
Section: Cir Structure and The Related Gcr Flux Modulationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the graph V(t) reveals a slight depletion before the main rise of V. The graph CR(t) shows the pre-CIR slight increase in CR in more detail (e.g., Lockwood 1971), which is hereafter denoted as "nose". As we show below, the nose is most likely a consequence of the pre-event phase of the decreased V and the steep magnetic field gradient related to the compression caused by the interaction of the fast and slow solar wind (Kirin et al 2020).…”
Section: Cir Structure and The Related Gcr Flux Modulationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Because the proposed explanation for this weak increase in GCR flux before the main FD decrease is quite speculative and cannot be fully confirmed by our analysis, we should also consider another possible explanation that is related to the mirror effect at a steep gradient of the magnetic field (including the situation in which a forward shock has already formed) in the region in which the fast solar wind compresses the plasma in the interaction with slow solar wind. In this respect, we note that in the situation in which cylindrical geometry cannot be applied and the adiabatic approximation is not valid, the mirror effect is quite complex and cannot easily be included in the hydrodynamical model such as employed here, that is, the numerical approach has to be applied (see Kirin et al 2020). The results presented by Kirin et al (2020) show that a certain population of particles tends to stay bound to the shock for a certain period of time, indicating that this effect may explain the weak increase in GCR flux before the main FD decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanisms that affect the modulation of GCRs can be differentiated for the different ICME substructures and physical properties of each region (e.g., Barnden 1973bBarnden , 1973a. The first feature to affect the GCR flux is the ICME shock, which acts as a discontinuity that can reflect particles causing an initial increase in the GCR flux observed just prior to the arrival of some ICMEs and contribute to the initial decrease in GCR flux after the ICME arrival (Cane 2000;Kirin et al 2020). Next, the turbulence of the sheath region acts as a diffusive barrier and affects GCR transport across the region associated with the first decrease in GCR flux (e.g., Wibberenz et al 1997Wibberenz et al , 1998; thus, models often focus on solving the diffusionconvection equation (e.g., Bland 1976;Nishida 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%