2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00030-008-7075-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Internal and Boundary Stabilization of Timoshenko Beams

Abstract: In this paper we consider Timoshenko systems with either internal or boundary feedbacks. We establish explicit and generalized decay results, without imposing restrictive growth assumption near the origin on the damping terms. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 35B37, 35L55, 74D05, 93D15, 93D20.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1921, Timoshenko [21] gave, as model for a thick beam, the following system of coupled hyperbolic equations ρu tt = K (u x − ϕ) x , in (0, L) × (0, +∞), (1.1) by Messaoudi and Mustafa [13], where the decay rate has been discussed for several systems and without imposing any growth condition on the damping functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1921, Timoshenko [21] gave, as model for a thick beam, the following system of coupled hyperbolic equations ρu tt = K (u x − ϕ) x , in (0, L) × (0, +∞), (1.1) by Messaoudi and Mustafa [13], where the decay rate has been discussed for several systems and without imposing any growth condition on the damping functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for example, the literature. () For laminated Timoshenko beams without time delay, there are just a few published works. Wang et al considered the boundary with one end fixed: (ω(0)=ψ(0)=s(0)=0) and ψ(1)ωx(1)=k1ωt(1),sx(1)=0,(3sxψx)(1)=k2(3stψt)(1) at the other end and established the exponential stability by assuming GρDIρ and k i ≠ r i ,( i =1,2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also obtained the rate of decay of the energy, which is exactly the rate of decay of the relaxation functions. This last result has been improved and generalized by Messaoudi and Soufyane [13] and Messaoudi and Mustafa [15] (see also [17][18][19]22,26]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 66%