2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40196-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Interplay between Content Popularity and Performance in P2P Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 presents typical values of the parameters defined in Table 3. They are based on works of the literature such as [3,4,7,[15][16][17][18]. As it can be seen, there are four scenarios, representing swarms, categorized in accordance with the content type: Music Files (MF); TV Series (TS); Movies (M); All Media (AM).…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 presents typical values of the parameters defined in Table 3. They are based on works of the literature such as [3,4,7,[15][16][17][18]. As it can be seen, there are four scenarios, representing swarms, categorized in accordance with the content type: Music Files (MF); TV Series (TS); Movies (M); All Media (AM).…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, future work may include the following avenues: to propose novel analytical and simulation models to more accurately understand how P2P system capacity scales in proportion to the population growth, including systems under flash crowds [30][31][32]; envisioning more advanced networks, to consider other replication scenarios with much larger file sizes and download/upload rates than those examined herein [24][25][26][27][28][29]; to compare the paradigms of P2P systems and Information Centric Networks (ICN) [33], respectively, to find out which one is potentially more resilient to the unprecedented increase of global traffic in today's Internet; and to develop novel P2P algorithms devoted to live streaming and mobile networks [18,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otra parte, teniendo en cuenta los sistemas P2P analizados en [13], se sabe que alrededor de 40% a 70% de los swarms tienen sólo tres o menos pares, y que más de 70% de los swarms son de tamaño más pequeño que diez [14]. Estos números refuerzan la creencia general de que la mayoría de los escenarios presentan cargas de trabajo con alta dispersión temporal.…”
Section: A Dispersión Temporalunclassified