1971
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210040341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interpretation of hall and thermoelectric effects in polycrystalline films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 We suggest that the charge carrier scattering mechanisms near room temperature should be dominated by grain boundary scattering. The charge carrier mobility limited by the grain boundary scattering can be described as: 18,46,47…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 We suggest that the charge carrier scattering mechanisms near room temperature should be dominated by grain boundary scattering. The charge carrier mobility limited by the grain boundary scattering can be described as: 18,46,47…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model, which was described in detail for Hall measurements of Li-doped NiO [16,17], can explain the observed sign change of the Hall mobility as a function of temperature for the given sample. However, one needs to keep in mind that this previous work on the Hall effect for a combination of transport paths with different charge carrier signs and different mobilities (see also refs [18][19][20]) referred to charge transport in crystalline materials whereas the here investigated material consists partly of an amorphous phase where the Hall effect has an anomalous sign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To model the average effect of the grain boundaries or grain surfaces, we found some prior studies in the literature. A physical model by Lipskis et al [84] and by Orton and Powell [85] is based on expressing mobility as a function of inverse of average grain size and potential barrier height at the grain barriers, however the model parameters are obtained by fitting to the measured temperature-dependent mobility data [86]. Another model, that is more suitable for our samples, includes the combined effects of grain boundaries and surfaces in a material.…”
Section: Carrier-surface Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%