2019
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00701.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interrelation of 1/f neural noise and norepinephrine system activity during motor response inhibition

Abstract: Several lines of evidence suggest that there is a close interrelation between the degree of noise in neural circuits and the activity of the norepinephrine (NE) system, yet the precise nexus between these aspects is far from being understood during human information processing and cognitive control in particular. We examine this nexus during response inhibition in n = 47 healthy participants. Using high-density EEG recordings, we estimate neural noise by calculating “1/ f noise” of those data and integrate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and 1/f slope and theta are typically largest at frontocentral locations (Pertermann, Mückschel, Adelhöfer, Ziemssen, & Beste, 2019). This was confirmed by a review of topographical plots.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…and 1/f slope and theta are typically largest at frontocentral locations (Pertermann, Mückschel, Adelhöfer, Ziemssen, & Beste, 2019). This was confirmed by a review of topographical plots.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, it would be reasonable to speculate that NA and the 1/f neural noise are interrelated. A recent study 38 could indeed provide evidence that NA as measured reliably by the pupil diameter 39 and the 1/f neural noise are correlated. Counterintuitively, however, they showed a positive correlation suggesting that higher levels of NA indicate a flatter power spectrum and stronger neural noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Perceptual learning protocols likely affect gain control mechanisms by improving the signal‐to‐noise ratio (B. Dosher & Lu, ). Importantly, there is a close relation between signal‐to‐noise ratio and variability in neural processes (Bensmann, Roessner, Stock, & Beste, ; Buckley & Toyoizumi, ; Servan‐Schreiber et al, ; Yousif et al, ; Ziegler, Pedersen, Mowinckel, & Biele, ) that is also affecting inhibitory control (Pertermann, Mückschel, Adelhöfer, Ziemssen, & Beste, ). It is, therefore, important to consider intraindividual variability when being interested in the effects of protocols inducing neural plasticity on cognitive (control) processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%